##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Rafal Chudy
Vilis Brukas
Livia Zapponi
Kevin Boston
Frederick Cubbage

Keywords:

editorial, Forests Monitor, mission, scientific publishing

Abstract

On behalf of our editors and scientific board members, we are delighted to welcome you to the inaugural issue of Forests Monitor. Launching a new journal dedicated to addressing pressing challenges in academic publishing is a significant endeavor, and we would like to share the purpose and focus of Forests Monitor, as well as the unique benefits it offers to readers, reviewers, and prospective authors. The mission of Forests Monitor is to accelerate scientific and practical discourse on the applied science of multifunctional forest ecosystems. By providing a robust platform for exchanging ideas supported by a rigorous peer-review process, we aim to contribute meaningfully to advancing forest management and governance. Our vision for Forests Monitor is to become a premier applied scientific journal that bridges forest ecology and conservation, forest management and planning, and forest policy and economics—all under one umbrella. Forests Monitor seeks to foster scientific development and promote meaningful dialogue by publishing original research articles, comprehensive reviews, thought-provoking opinion pieces, forest perspectives, and book reviews related to multifunctional forest ecosystems. This editorial also summarizes the contributions included in our inaugural issue, where we published five articles, including two research papers and three perspectives on forestry. The contributions address a diverse range of topics across the globe, such as Forest Stewards Guild position statement on climate-smart forestry, forest governance in the Nordic region, defining and monitoring forest disturbances and damages, methods for tracking forest pests in the United States, and the role of retention border zones in enhancing broadleaf habitats within production forests in Sweden. In this editorial, we also want to highlight how you can support our grassroot mission.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Editorials
References

Colquhoun D. 2003. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors. Nature 423, 479. https://doi.org/10.1038/423479a

Eriksson LO, Lodin I, Felton A, Brukas V, Nilsson M. 2024. For. Monit. 1(1): 99-121. https://doi.org/10.62320/fm.v1.i1.11

Finardi U. 2013. Correlation between Journal Impact Factor and Citation Performance: An experimental study. Journal of Informetrics Volume 7, Issue 2, April 2013, Pages 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.004

Foster A, Rahimzadeh-Bajgiran P, Daigneault A, Weiskittel A 2024. Cost-effectiveness of remote sensing technology for spruce budworm monitoring in Maine, USA. For. Monit. 1(1): 66-98. https://doi.org/10.62320/fm.v1.i1.14

Hanson MA, Gómez Barreiro P, Crosetto P, Brockington D. 2024. The strain on scientific publishing. Quantitative Science Studies 2024; 5 (4): 823–843. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00327

Himes A, Hayes P, Jansens JW, Patterson C, Singer J, Evans Z. 2024. Forest Stewards Guild position on climate-smart forestry. For. Monit. 1(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.62320/fm.v1.i1.3

Lawrence PA. 2003. The politics of publication. Nature 422, 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1038/422259a

Nebasifu A, Fridén A, Ekström H, Pietarinena N, Harrinkari T, D’Amato D, Droste N. 2024. An outlook on modalities in Nordic forest governance. For. Monit. 1(1): 16-38. https://doi.org/10.62320/fm.v1.i1.7

McGill B. 2024. The state of academic publishing in 3 graphs, 6 trends, and 4 thoughts. Posted on April 29, 2024. Available from: https://dynamicecology.wordpress.com/2024/04/29/the-state-of-academic-publishing-in-3-graphs-5-trends-and-4-thoughts/

Robertson G, Linser S, Köhl M. 2024. Forest disturbance and damage: Perspectives for forest monitoring and reporting. For. Monit. 1(1): 39-65. https://doi.org/10.62320/fm.v1.i1.10

Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ. 1997 Feb 15;314(7079): 498-502. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497

Tennat J. 2018. Elsevier are corrupting open science in Europe. Accessed 23 December 2024. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2018/jun/29/elsevier-are-corrupting-open-science-in-europe

How to Cite

Introducing the inaugural issue of Forests Monitor: an international peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal. (2025). Forests Monitor, 1(1), i-viii. https://doi.org/10.62320/fm.v1.i1.20