##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Guy Robertson
Stefanie Linser
Michael Köhl

Keywords:

damage, damage indicators, disturbance, forest condition, forest monitoring, forest reporting

Abstract

In this forest perspectives paper, we explore issues and concepts involved in the enhancement of regional monitoring frameworks for reporting on forest disturbances and damages. First, we consider the different meanings of “forest disturbance” and “forest damage,” terms that are often used interchangeably but have important differences in meaning and management implications. Human expectations, goals and concerns underlie both terms, especially forest damage, and they condition the data-gathering efforts and interpretations of resulting information. Accordingly, we also address the overall motivations for reporting forest disturbances and damages, the potentially impacted human expectations, and the general categories of impact and response. Next, we present some general observations on the ecological processes underlying forest disturbances and forest damages and the approaches used to measure them, noting the following challenges these processes pose for clear and consistent reporting across space and time: complexity of disturbance processes; attributing causality and distinguishing between proximate, intermediate and ultimate causes; spatial and temporal discontinuities; measurement protocol variations between countries. Both ecological processes and their related measurement techniques are particularistic, involving various and specific measurement techniques and protocols, and they do not always conform to conceptual generalizations. We conclude with a discussion on bridging the gap between concept and practical application of disturbance and damage monitoring and reporting. Despite challenges in aggregating diverse data on forest disturbances, doing so is crucial for improving scientific understanding, policy-making, and environmental management on regional and global scales.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Forest perspectives
References

Attiwill PM. 1994. The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management. Forest Ecology and Management, 63: 247-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)90114-7

Bastrup-Birk A, Reker J, Zal N, Romao C, Cugny-Seguin M, Malak DA, Aggestam F, Barbati A, Barredo J, Camia A, Caudullo G, Chirici G, Ciccarese L, Corona P, Delbaere B, Rigo D, Durrant T, Eggers J, Elmauer T, Estreguil E, Garcia-Feced C, Jones-Walters L, Kauhanen E, Konijnendijk, C, Kraus D, Larsson T-B, Lindner M, Linser S, Lombardi F, Marchetti M, Mavsar R, Moffat A, Nabuurs G-J, Pülzl H, Raitio H, Rousi M, San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Schelhaas M-J, Schuck A, Shannon M, Tomé M, Van Brusselen J, Zizenis M. 2016. European forest ecosystems. State and trends. EEA Report No 5/2016, 128 p. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2800/964893

Bélouard T, Marchadier R, Merzeau D, Meredieu C, Brunet B, Drouineau S, Paillassa E, Riou-Nivert P. 2012. Évaluation des facteurs de résistance au vent des peuplements de pin maritime après la tempête Klaus à l’aide des données de l’inventaire forestier. 77 p. Available online: https://inventaire-forestier.ign.fr/IMG/pdf/Etude_stabilite_Klaus_2013-01-31.pdf

Bengston DN. 1994. Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Society and Natural Resources 7(6):515-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929409380885

Birdsey RA, Dugan AJ, Healey SP, Dante-Wood K, Zhang F, Mo G, Chen JM, Hernandez AJ, Raymond CL, McCarter J. 2019. Assessment of the influence of disturbance, management activities, and environmental factors on carbon stocks of U.S. national forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-402. Fort Collins, CO, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 116 p.

Bisgaard Jensen J. 2024. Miljøstyrelsen: Derfor hjemtager vi skovstatistikken. Dansk Skovforening, 14.03.2024. Available online: https://www.danskskovforening.dk/skoven/miljoestyrelsen-derfor-hjemtager-vi-skovstatistikken/

BMEL. 2024. Der Wald in Deutschland - Ausgewählte Ergebnisse der vierten Bundeswaldinventur. Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, Bonn, Germany. Available online: www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Broschueren/vierte-bundeswaldinventur.pdf

Borecki T, Brzeziecki B, Stepien E, Wojcik R. 2015. Development of forest inventory methods in multifunctional forest management. Folia Forestalia Polonica, series A, Vol. 57 (2): 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1515/ffp-2015-0012

Brezina D, Michal J, Hlavácková P. 2024. The impact of natural disturbances on the central European timber market - an analytical study. Forests, 15: 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15040592

Campbell S, Liegel L. 1996. Disturbance and forest health in Oregon and Washington. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-381. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 121 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-381

Ellis TM, Bowman DMJS, Jain P, Flannigan MD, Williamson GJ. 2022. Global increase in wildfire risk due to climate-driven declines in fuel moisture. Global Change Biology, 28(4): 1544-1559. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16006

Emmert L, Negrón-Juárez RI, Chambers JQ, Santos J, Lima AJN, Trumbore S, Marra DM. 2023. Sensitivity of optical satellites to estimate windthrow tree-mortality in a Central Amazon forest. Remote Sensing, 15: 4027. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15164027

FAO. 2020a. Forest-related disasters: three case studies and lessons for management of extreme events. Forestry Working Paper 17. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy. 114 p.

FAO. 2020b. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main report. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9825en

FAO and CPF. 2022. Status of, and trends in, the Global Core Set of Forest-related Indicators. FAO and Collaborative Partnership on Forests (CPF), Rome, Italy. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb9963en

Ferretti M, Waldner P, Vertraeten A, Schmitz A, Michel A, Zlindra D, Marchetto A, Hansen K, Pitar D, Gottardini E, Calatayud V, Haeni M, Schaub M, Kirchner T, Hiederer R, Potocic N, Timmermann V, Ognjenovic M, Schuck A, Held A, Nikinmaa L, Köhl M, Marchetti M, Linser S. 2020. Criterion 2: maintenance of forest ecosystem health and vitality. In: State of Europe's Forests 2020 Report. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe - FOREST EUROPE. Bratislava, Slovakia. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347986582_Criterion_2_Maintenance_of_Forest_Ecosystem_Health_and_Vitality

Finlay SE, Moffat A, Gazzard R, Baker D, Murray V. 2012. Health Impacts of Wildfires. PLOS Currents Disasters, 4: e4f959951cce2c. https://doi.org/10.1371/4f959951cce2c

Forzieri G, Pecchi M, Girardello M, Mauri A, Klaus M, Nikolov C, Rüetschi M, Gardiner B, Tomaštík J, Small D, Nistor C, Jonikavicius D, Spinoni J, Feyen L, Giannetti F, Comino R, Wolynski, A., Pirotti, F., Maistrelli, F., Savulescu, I., Wurpillot-Lucas, S., Karlsson, S., Zieba-Kulawik, K., Strejczek-Jazwinska, P., Mokroš, M., Franz, S., Krejci, L., Haidu, I., Nilsson, M., Wezyk, P., Catani, F., Chen, Y.-Y., Luyssaert, S., Chirici, G., Cescatti, A.; Beck, P.S A. (2020). A spatially explicit database of wind disturbances in European forests over the period 2000–2018. Earth System Science Data, 12(1): 257–276. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-257-2020

Fowler C. 2003. Human health impacts of forest fires in the Southern United States: a literature review. Journal of Ecological Anthropology 7(1): 39-63. https://doi.org/10.5038/2162-4593.7.1.3

Gardiner B, Schuck A, Schelhaas MJ, Orazio C, Blennow K, Nicoll B. 2013. Living with storm damage to forests. What science can tell us 3. European Forest Institute. Joensuu, Finland. Available online: https://efi.int/sites/default/files/files/publication-bank/2018/efi_wsctu3_2013.pdf

Government of Canada. 2021. Enhanced forest inventory techniques. Natural Resources Canada. Available online: https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/our-natural-resources/forests/sustainable-forest-management/measuring-and-reporting/forest-inventory/enhanced-forest-inventory-techniques/13421

Hislop S, Haywood A, Jones S, Soto-Berelov M, Skidmore A, Nguyen T. 2020. A satellite data driven approach to monitoring and reporting fire disturbance and recovery across boreal and temperate forests. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.102034

Isoaho K, Burgas D, Janasik N, Mönkkönen M, Peura M, Hukkinen JI. 2019. Changing forest stakeholders’ perception of ecosystem services with linguistic nudging. Ecosystem Services 40: 101028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101028

Johnson EA, Morin H, Miyanishi K, Gagnon R, Greene DF. 2003. A process approach to understanding disturbance and forest dynamics for sustainable forestry. In P.J. Burton, C. Messier, D.W. Smith and W.L. Adamowicz (Eds). Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest. NRC-CNRC, NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Canada.

Johnson F, Hanighan I, Henderson S, Morgan G, Bowman D. 2011. Extreme air pollution events from bushfires and dust storms and their association with mortality in Sydney, Australia 1994–2007. Environmental Research 111(6): 811-816, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.05.007

Kaarakka L, Rothey J, Dee LE. 2023. Managing forests for carbon - Status of the forest carbon offset markets in the United States. PLOS Climate 2(7): e0000158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000158

Kangas A, Maltamo M. 2006. Forest inventory. Methodology and applications. Managing Forest Ecosystems. Vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. p. 155-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4381-3

Kautz M, Meddens AJH, Hall RJ, Arneth A. 2017. Biotic disturbances in Northern Hemisphere forests – A synthesis of recent data, uncertainties and implications for forest monitoring and modelling. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26(5): 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12558

Ke P, Ciais P, Sitch S, Li W, Bastos A, Liu Z, Xu Y, Gui X, Bian J, Goll D, Xi Y, Li W, O'Sullivan M, Souza J, Friedlingstein P, Chevallier F. 2024. Low latency carbon budget analysis reveals a large decline of the land carbon sink in 2023. Preprint submitted to Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.12447

Keyser A, Westerling AL. 2009. Modeling forest fire severity in California, USA. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2009. U13B-0065.

Kleinman JS, Goode JD, Fries AC, Hart JL. 2019. Ecological consequences of compound disturbances in forest ecosystems: a systematic review. Ecosphere 10(11): e02962. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2962

Koch FH, Yemshanov D, Haack RA. 2014. Modeling the spread of forest pests via recreational firewood: implications for phytosanitary regulations. Journal of Economic Entomology, 107(1): 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC13213

Köhl M, Linser S, Prins K. 2020. State of Europe’s Forests Report. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe - FOREST EUROPE. Bratislava, Slovakia. Available online: https://foresteurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/SoEF_2020.pdf

Köhl M, Koch F, Linser S, Melin M, Robertson G, Talarczyk A. 2024. Reporting on forest damages and disturbances in the UNECE region. ECE/TIM/SP/57. United Nations Publication. ISBN 978-92-1-003015-1. Available online: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/ECE_TIM_SP_57E_2326208WEB_0.pdf

Kunegel-Lion M, Lewis MA. 2020. Factors governing outbreak dynamics in a forest intensively managed for mountain pine beetle. Scientific Reports 10 (1): 7601. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63388-8

Ladin ZS, Ferrell B, Dums JT, Moore RM, Levia DF, Shriver WG, D’Amico V, Trammell TLE, Setubal, JC, Wommack KE. 2021. Assessing the efficacy of eDNA metabarcoding for measuring microbial biodiversity within forest ecosystems. Scientific Reports 11 (1): 1629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80602-9

Lausch A, Borg E, Bumberger J, Dietrich P, Heurich M,Huth A; Jung A, Klenke R, Knapp S, Mollenhauer H, Paasche H, Paulheim H, Pause M, Schweitzer C, Schmulius C, Settele J, Skidmore AK, Wegmann M, Zacharias S, Kirsten T, Schaepman ME. 2018. Understanding forest health with remote sensing, Part III: Requirements for a scalable multi-source forest health monitoring network based on data science approaches. Remote Sensing 10: 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071120

Lertzman K, Fall J. 1998. From forest stands to landscapes: spatial scales and the roles of disturbances. In: D. Peterson and V. T. Thomas (Eds), Ecological scales-theory and applications. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN: 10: 0231105037

Lindner M, Maroschek M, Netherer S, Kremer A, Barbati A, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Seidl R, Delzon S, Corona P, Kolstro M, Lexer MJ, Marchetti M. 2010. Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 259 (4): 698-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023

Linser S. 2020. Indicator C2: Policies, institutions and instruments to maintain forest ecosystem health and vitality. In: State of Europe’s Forests 2020 Report. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe - FOREST EUROPE. Bratislava, Slovakia.

Linser S, Prins K. 2022. An assessment of uptake of the Global Core set of Forest-related Indicators. FAO and CPF Reports CC2223EN/1/09.22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2223en

Lister AJ, Andersen H, Frescino T, Gatziolis D, Healey S, Heath LS, Liknes GC, McRoberts R, Moisen GG, Nelson M, Riemann R, Schleeweis K, Schroeder TA, Westfall J, Wilson BT. 2020. Use of remote sensing data to improve the efficiency of National Forest Inventories: a case study from the United States National Forest Inventory. Forests, 11: 1364. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11121364

McRoberts RE, Tomppo E, Czaplewski R. 2016. Sampling designs for national forest assessments. Knowledge Reference for National Forest Assessments. SLU and FAO. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/national_forest_assessment/images/PDFs/English/KR2_EN__4_.pdf

Michel A, Kirchner T, Prescher AK, Schwärzel K. 2023. Forest condition in Europe: The 2023 assessment. ICP Forests Technical Report under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (Air Convention). Eberswalde: Thünen Institute. https://doi.org/10.3220/ICPTR1697801881000

Montealegre AL, Lamelas MT, Tanase MA, de la Riva J. 2014. Forest fire severity assessment using ALS data in a Mediterranean environment. Remote Sensing, 6: 4240-4265. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6054240

Montréal Process. 2015. Criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests, Fifth Edition. Available online: https://www.montrealprocess.org/documents/publications/techreports/MontrealProcessSeptember2015.pdf

Montréal Process. 2023. Montreal Process: Synthesis of indicator trends 1990 to 2020 and future outlooks. Editor: Payn, T.W. Authors: Payn, T.W.; Downey, M.; Han, H.; Howell, C.; Klinger, S.; Matsuura, T.; Robertson, G.; Sadiq, T. Scion, New Zealand. 44pp. Available online: https://montreal-process.org/documents/publications/techreports/MontrealProcessSynthesisReport2023EnglishONLINE.pdf

Moritz MA, Topik C, Allen CD, Hessburg PF; Morgan P, Odion DC, Veblen TT, McCullough IM. 2018. A statement of common ground regarding the role of wildfire in forested landscapes of the Western United States. Fire Research Consensus Working Group Final Report.

Muys B, Angelstam P, Bauhus J, Bouriaud L, Jactel H, Kraigher H, Müller J, Pettorelli N, Pötzelsberger E, Primmer E, Svoboda M, Thorsen BJ, Van Meerbeek K. 2022. Forest biodiversity in Europe. From Science to Policy 13. European Forest Institute. Joensuu, Finland. https://doi.org/10.36333/fs13

Nabuurs GJ, Begemann A, Linser S, Paillet Y, Pettenella D, Ermgassen S. 2024. Sustainable finance and forest biodiversity criteria. From Science to Policy 16. European Forest Institute. Joensuu, Finland. https://doi.org/10.36333/fs16

Ohmann JL, Gregory MJ, Roberts HM. 2014. Scale considerations for integrating forest inventory plot data and satellite image data for regional forest mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment 151 (7): 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.048

Parks SA, Holsinger LM, Miller C, Nelson CR. 2015. Wildland fire as a self-regulating mechanism: the role of previous burns and weather in limiting fire progression. Ecological Applications, 25(6): 1478-1492. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1430.1

Patacca M, Lindner M, Lucas‐Borja ME, Cordonnier T, Fidej G, Gardiner B, Hauf Y, Jasinevicius G, Labonne S, Linkevicius E, Mahnken M, Milanovic S, Nabuurs GJ, Nagel TA, Nikinmaa L, Panyatov M, Bercak R, Seidl R, Ostrogovic Sever MZ, Socha J, Thom D, Vuletic D, Zudin S, Schelhaas MJ. 2023. Significant increase in natural disturbance impacts on European forests since 1950. Global change biology, 29(5), 1359-1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16531

Perera AH, Buse LJ. 2004. Emulating natural disturbance in forest management: an overview. In A.H. Perera, L.J. Buse and M.G. Weber (Eds), Emulating natural forest landscape disturbances: concepts and applications. New York, Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-12915-5

Robinne FN. 2021. Impacts of disasters on forests, in particular forest fires. Background Paper prepared for the United Nations Forum on Forests Secretariat. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350850462_UNFF16_background_paper_Impacts_of_disasters_on_forests_in_particular_forest_fires

Rogers P. 1996. Disturbance ecology and forest management: a review of the literature. General Technical Report INT-GTR-336. United States Department of Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.2737/INT-GTR-336

Ross A. 2023. Forest damage and forest supply chains: a literature review and reflections. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 34(3): 330-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2023.2240607

Seidl R, Mueller J, Hothorn T, Baessler C, Heurich M, Kautz M. 2016. Small beetle, large-scale drivers: how regional and landscape factors affect outbreaks of the European spruce bark beetle. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53: 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12540

Seidl R, Schelhaas MJ, Rammer W, Verkerk PJ. 2014a. Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage. Nature Climate Change 4: 806–810. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2318

Seidl R, Rammer W, Spies TA. 2014b. Disturbance legacies increase the resilience of forest ecosystem structure, composition, and functioning. Ecological Applications 24: 2063–77. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0255.1

Seidl R, Schelhaas MJ, Lexer MJ. 2011. Unraveling the drivers of intensifying forest disturbance regimes in Europe. Global Change Biology, 17: 2842–2852, https://doi.org/110.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02452.x

Senf C, Seidl R. 2020. Mapping the forest disturbance regimes of Europe. Nature Sustainability, 4: 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00609-y

Smith J, Hoover C. 2024. Sensitivity of fire indicators on forest inventory plots is affected by fire severity and time since burning. Forests, 15: 1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15071264

Tang L, Shao G. 2015. Drone remote sensing for forestry research and practices. Journal of Forestry Research, 26(4):791–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0088-y

Thom D, Seidl R. 2016. Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests. Biological Reviews, 91: 760–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12193

Turner MG. 2010. Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology, 91(10): 2833-2849. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0097.1

USDA Forest Service. 2020. Major forest insect and disease conditions in the United States: 2018. FS-1155. USDA Forest Service. Washington D.C.

Vacher C, Castagneyrol B, Jousselin E, Schimann H. 2021. Trees and insects have microbiomes: consequences for forest health and management. Current Forestry Reports 7(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-021-00136-9

Wei X, Kimmins JP. 2012. Sustainable forest management in a disturbance context: a case study of Canadian sub-boreal forests. In: J.J. Diez (ed.): Sustainable forest management - case studies. IntechOpen, pp. 119-140. https://doi.org/10.5772/32391

How to Cite

Forest disturbance and damage: Perspectives for forest monitoring and reporting. (2024). Forests Monitor, 1(1), 39-65. https://doi.org/10.62320/fm.v1.i1.10

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.